Europa Europa ?

Anders Behring Brevik is a madman. Get that straight. And anyone who defends his actions as that of a patriot needs serious psychiatric treatment.

True that he speaks of multiculturalism as cultural communism which aims at withering away of the European entity and the emasculation of the European male through the promotion of the moronic ideology of feminism (which has been done very successfully). He is so very right when he says that internationalism/multiculturalism/liberalism is Communism 2.0 which aims at withering away of the European states. He rightly speaks the evident truth of Islamism being the biggest danger today for the free society and how Europe is going to lose this demographic war if the present impotence of its governments continue. He also brings forth as to how political correctness is nothing but a noose that is tightening slowly around Europe’s neck. He also shows his extensive research when he gives the record of Islam’s bloody history in the subcontinent, especially that in India where it caused a drop in the population by close to eighty million from 1000-1526 AD and as to how the independent governments in India have done nothing to reign in this monster.

But all his great ideology came to a naught when the first bullet fired from his rifle found its victim. Killing one’s own blood for spreading around your message can never be justified. It is a crime which only deserves capital punishment which ironically none of the European nations have thanks to their “humanitarian” handicap. One simply cannot justify the action of killing children to state that “Its better that I kill them before the Islamic monsters do”. The kids only fault was that they were attending a youth camp organized by a party who’s liberal ways were resentful to him. The seven government employees had the crime of working for the government who’s liberal policies were distasteful for him.

A patriot ,as he likes to call himself, never kills defenceless children or harmless office goers. That is the work of a cowardly sociopath. He fights against the enemies of the society/nation. By any means possible. That alone is a strong enough message for his countrymen.

But then everything in Europe has become haywire. It is not just the Old World now. It is in danger of becoming the Obsolete World.

Europe today stands at a very precarious turn. After dominating the economy and every other aspect of the world for nearly five centuries, the glory is finally fleeting. All the glitz and glamour today is only on the surface but the rot has started from within. All its spleandour is on the basis of past glories. And they are waning slowly and steadily. Looks like loot money can only take one this far. The only ones who can talk greatly of Europe are the brainwashed rootless generations of their erstwhile colonies. And their numbers are falling too.

Europeans still cannot fathom the fact that their best days are beyond them. And they are not coming back. That’s why when you see some of their clowns showing a superior attitude and belittling Asians, one should feel pity and not anger. The only representative of the west today is Uncle Sam and they are at the most, his subjects who have been allowed to have money but not much arms. Europe has ceased to matter after the second world war as an entity that decides the turn of the world events. It could never have survived without the Marshall plan as their best was already swallowed by the two wars. What could be more evident than the fact that not a single major company in Europe was created after the second world war (with a few exceptions like Heckler & Koch, but that too was made on the base of the pre war establishment). Switzerland is therefore a little country that can’t survive without the corrupt politicians of the third world stashing money in its banks and without tourists who come to its hills for skiing thanks to the hype generated. Spain was once the foremost power in Europe thanks to the loot and rape of the indigenous south Americans it carried out but it itself was kicked out by the people who it created by interracial engineering and today remains a country which runs on tourism and has little else to fall back on. Similar is the case with Portugal and Italy (who greatness too ended quite a long time ago) where they treat tailoring and carpentry like rocket science (take out advertising and the hoopla and one can see that all the luxurious exorbitantly priced Italian and French brands are nothing but hype and exaggeration. For the love of god, don’t tell me that something like Chanel perfumes or Hermes bags cannot be made outside France or that better suits can’t be tailored outside Italy). France always put up the show of being mighty but it had others fighting for it. The Germans showed how mighty it is in 1940. Since then it has been little more than a contributor to UN peacekeepers where military strength is concerned. England too today is little more than being the 51^st state of Uncle Sam.Take out London and you have nothing which shows signs of a mighty nation. The lesser said about the others, the better. The Scandinavian nations are wealthy and prosperous but then, their say in world matters is small.

The insignificance and descent to third rate status in world affairs of Spain, Portugal and Belgium is an answer to anyone who does not believe in divine justice. These are the countries that made their fortune solely by the genocide of inhabitants in their occupied territories and by siphoning off their resources. The horrors of Belgian rule in Congo and that of the Spanish and Portuguese Inquisitions are legendary. Looks like what goes around does come around. Britain’s and France’s name cannot be added to this list because their hands are stained with blood as much as anyone else but they were also the pioneers of many scientific developments and inventions. They did not merely live off the loot of their lands. But that does not lessen their culpability and their reduced role in the world too is nothing less of divine justice. Being nuclear powers today and having a permanent seat in the UN security council will not make them what they were prior to the second world war. Its just like a quadriplegic getting the latest wheelchair with all kinds of gizmos which he can use to do amazing things but he still will never be able to walk again.

The only nation worth its salt in Europe is and always has been Deutschland (somehow I love this name more than the anglicized Germany) simply because it never needed to make colonies and loot them in order to become great. What it became great through is sheer quality it produced in its people. May it be inventions in any field or development of arts and music during the three or four centuries, one is sure to find a german name in it. Even in the lowest point of it being a human civilization, this did not change. Heinz Guderian’s Achtung Panzer will always remain an integral part of Armoured warfare. The American space programme is actually German space programme, by von Braun & co. Critics might argue that Germany’s post war rise has been because of Marshall plan but then, America has poured in tons of money in countries like Pakistan. What has it done with it?

But all this is changing. The post war generation in Europe grew on the new found wealth brought by the Marshall plan and in an environment of demilitarization and pacifism. One thinks that peace and lasting harmony brings out the best in people and makes them grow but it seems to have quite the opposite effect.

In Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace – and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. – The Third Man (1949)

This kind of disastrous peace was seen in India under the Ashokan misrule of three decades which the seculars like to hail as the golden period of India. What it did was to eat away at the very core of the Hindu society by promotion of Buddhism and destruction of martial spirit and qualities. It only ended with the deserved abrupt end of the blighted dynasty. History repeated itself in post war Europe. All the peace and quiet instead of making Europeans great again produced a next generation that was nowhere near their predecessors. The young generation since then has been devoid of any sort of pride or nationalism and embraces extreme individualism and its grotesque derivatives that have shown up in every decade, the most notorious being feminism. The remaining damage was done by the suicidal family planning policies which discouraged an already limited populace to reproduce. The disastrous effects are for all of us to see where European nations today are not even able to replenish their population and are now showing a negative population growth. The deficit needless to say is being filled by the immigrants who have changed the society in these countries almost irrevocably. And most of them come from Islamic nations. That makes the problem grave as assimilation and loyalty to their host society has never been their strong point.

They rightly incorporated egalitarianism in the society but in a very wrong way. In the name of freedom and equality, the essential qualities like nationalism and ethnic pride along with religious identity were done away with and casted in a very negative light. This has resulted in things like German youth feeling uneasy with the use of the name Deutschland and Christmas being named Winterwall in many places so that the minorities wont be “offended”. Qualities like manliness and clear and unapologetic thought were frowned upon and suicidal trends like multiculturalism and feminism were included which caused the mutilation of society on a permanent basis. Add to that the self destructive policy adopted by the European governments of giving a handsome stipend to the unemployed citizens which gave rise to a whole section of a populace that does not prefer to be employed because they get paid too well for doing nothing. So why work when you can snort coke instead by taxpayer’s money. And its whites who overwhelmingly dominate this degenerate section of the population.

With limited population, labour became dear and hence had to be imported. First it was from eastern european nations like Hungary and Poland. But they too couldn’t keep up with the supply. So Africa and Asia came in next. And so the problem began, as an overwhelming number of them came from Islamic nations.A problem because unlike the Han Chinese or Hindus and Sikhs (who very quickly move up the social ladder and don’t remain in the labour class) and the east europeans, the muslim immigrants do adopt the culture as their own but make their own rules. An overwhelming number of them do not try to move up or contribute anything to the host society. They instead form ghettoes that become too big one day to engulf the original society itself.

The number of Muslim immigrants which started coming first as cheap labour in a matter of a decade became a torrent which made the Islamic population from non existent to almost one fifth in many countries today. Eurabia does not seem like a pipe dream anymore. Negative population growth in all European countries only makes this easier.

This is because they have by and large shown not to abide by the way of life of their adopted countries. From the littlest aspect such as dressing and other habits to the biggest ones. So one sees veiled figures in huge numbers in every major European city and mosques sprouting like weeds in every alley. Radical Islam is an alternative to European life which is being implemented by them with frightening efficiency. As a result we can see Mullahs/Imams and other “spiritual” leaders preaching hate with the same disdain in London as they do in Lahore. Or issuing fatwas in Rotterdam as easily as they might do in Riyadh. And killing daughters to save the family “honour” as easily in Antwerp as in Ankara. In Paris there are already countless areas which are a no go for non muslims. In London, armed Muslim gangs try to prey on British, Hindu and Sikh girls. And they are paid handsomely for achieving their “targets”.There are Muslim organizations who fearlessly proclaim loud their desire to turn the Buckingham palace into a mosque and to start their “conquest” from England. Sharia is already in place in many Muslim dominated areas in British cities. The stabbing and beheading of Theo van Gogh in Amsterdam by a Morrocan for making a short film critical to Islam is a stark reminder of what lies ahead.

In short European nations forgot that tolerance can only be affordable when a nation is strong enough to defend its way of life. And they still don’t want to learn.

The European society therefore is stuck in its own suicidal trap of political correctness and liberal values which they are proudly following but know deep down inside that they can hardly afford to do so. It is too easy to dismiss any talk of this impending danger as racism and fascism. So the crimes having the participation of North Africans increase but they can only smile sheepishly. The youth is too indifferent or is a parttaker in this roulette of tolerance. The governments refuse to address the problem itself, forget about doing anything about it. All this was too evident in the Mohammad cartoons controversy when British Muslims were shouting slogans about bombing UK on the streets in full view of the police.

Those who are frustrated by this impotence of the government and of the society to act and want to reclaim their national and religious identity. But they again are a confused lot as they never realize when their “patriotism” degenerates into racism. So we see the rise of various organizations of retards like neo Nazis and their likes whose nationalism is limited to creating drunken brawls and beating up some poor immigrant by ganging up on him. Or by throwing stones on policemen. They are too cowardly to confront the real enemies. It is from such frustration that Anders Breviks are born.

The European society today must realize that their way of life is too easy to destroy by the intolerant elements that they are tolerating in the name of tolerance. Unfettered immigration will have to be checked and if necessary stopped. More important is the rebuilding of their own societies which will start by getting to work and stop demanding sops from the government.

But most important is making their countries strong enough to defend their way of life. The time of the crusades might come again soon. But it will be lost if instead of knights they have liberal weaklings to fight it.

Superdaddy

Superdaddy sits on a throne in heaven. He is all powerful, all knowing,perfect in every aspect and yet he needs your money all the time, for his birthday or for building a house for him.

He is watching your every move every second.He will make the sky fall on your head if you take one sip of that whiskey or one drag of that cigarette or bat an eyelid at that girl you like.

You must praise him and flatter him all the time or he gets very angry.You must not speak any evil or do any evil while you are in his house. You can do them in any other place, even though he is claimed to be present everywhere.

He controls your mind and curse be upon you if any thought unfavourable to him ever arises in it.

You will be rewarded with eternal happiness if you surrender your brains and your soul to him.

He has a long list of things that you must do and should not do and if you go against them, he has a special place designed for you where you will keep on burning forever.

He will cast infernal fire on you if you dare to question him and pestilence will rain on you as long as you live if you deviate from his rules.

But he loves you, don't you forget that.

Art or Perversion?

We all know that junk food is really junk, all that is does is collect like trash in the body and adds up to the toxins and exits the body in the same disgusting way that it has come in. But still, we crave for it, gorge on it, all in the name of taste and don’t care how much of a land whale and waste dump it makes out of us. Its fun, we say.


Junk food has its equivalent in the Indian entertainment scenario, the Mumbai film industry, better known by its plagiarized and cheap name Bollywood (which people find cool for some reason). For more than six decades now, it has done the same thing to the brains of the Indian people what junk food does to the bodies of people worldwide.


What can one say about the creativity of an entertainment entity who’s name itself is an imitation noun?


It is not rocket science to guess what is the thing that dominates the consciousness of India today. A surfing tour through the television will reveal that half of the available one hundred odd channels in an average television will be airing the delightfully abhorrent visage of a Bollywood personality . What is shown does not matter. It might be an interview of a 40 something actor (?) who still enjoys playing the roles half his age, or an actress (that’s an irony, there are hardly any who can really claim to be that) who still wears the clothes fit for a teenager to hide the hideous abrasions that age and excessive make up has left on her face (ironically again, those marks are hid by the makeup itself) , or a starlet who thinks that wearing derriere hugging attire displaying her waxed legs constitutes acting and putting a fake accent means she has arrived, or a director who talks about his newest “creative & path breaking” venture with the usual opening lines “ Its actually a love story set in a very different scenario….”. The rest of the space is filled up by repeated trailers of new releases (which no one will remember three weeks after their release), vital news of which film star is going around with whom and shots of Bollywood starlet in some gaudy gown in events like Cannes (the media would like us believe that these leading ladies of Bollywood get all the attention there when the truth is that they are hardly noticed). And there is no escape from this for anyone. Noone can say that he or she does not care about such kind of news. One gets exposed and battered by the constant firing of this kind of news, 24/7. After all, one cannot just walk on the street and claim that he has not inhaled the polluted air. We all are today like the ducks bred for foie gras (a culinary specialty made of swollen duck liver which is a result of force feeding) and we are brutally being force fed this nonsense, the media being the steel pipe shoved down in our gullets.


The story of all the media visual or print is the same in this regard. One look at any news channel and one can very easily have the hallucination that India is run by Bollywood and television stars. The very fate of the country depends on the length of a starlet’s skirt (and what it covers and does not cover). Instances of entire prime time slots of news channels being hired to promote a new film are now somewhat of a norm. In other words, which actress sleeps with which director or which actor is lusting after which starlet is what constitutes of current affairs today.


And on the media’s part, it is its sacred duty to promote Bollywood as the sole Indian cinema, infact the face of India. It sings paeans of how Bollywood is taking the world by storm (sure it is, if Indian and Pakistani expats constitute your world), how Indian (read Bollywood) films are making their presence felt in the world (judging by the images of skimpily clad Bollywood actresses on the red carpet in Cannes and Venice. No other proof is required). In 2001, when Lagaan was nominated for the best foreign language film at the Oscars, the newspapers and the visual media went mad and all that mattered was Lagaan’s storyline and how it was so unique (when the truth was that barring the cricket component, it was just another tale of romanticization of destitute village life) and the history of the Academy awards. When it lost out to a worthier No Man’s Land, the newspapers had articles belittling the Oscars by any means possible from like how American centric they are (well they are made by Hollywood aren’t they) to how ridiculously dressed the invitees are. One bright fellow even wrote on the event of Denzel Washington and Halle Berry being the first African American pair to win the honours for Best Actor and Actress that after 9/11, America does not want to take chances with anything, hence it has begun with the pacification of its biggest racial minority by giving these two the awards. Maybe Bollywood has not just bought the newspaper, but also this guy’s brains. On TV, there were third rung actors speaking about how by not awarding Lagaan, the west has failed to understand the Indian culture. The pig circus didn’t seem to end.


The truth is that Bollywood is anything but artful and meaningful cinema, barring a handful of glorious exceptions. One look at its track record and one can see that it has been dominated by frightful homogeneity. The silent film era was dominated by mythological films which continued till the end of 1930s when sound came in. The 1940s and 1950s were dominated by candyfloss escapist romances where nothing seemed to be wrong in the world except for a comically evil villan in the form of the heroin’s father or a ruffian. The 1960s and 1970s went a step further. All the films in this period had without exception, alongwith the usual love triangles and quadrangles, the glorification of poverty and the socialist (?) way of life. Looking at the Bollywood’s films of the 50s, 60s and 70s, the villains were always rich men, whos biggest crime was being rich. Being rich meant that one had to be a smuggler or a black marketer. Or just a big businessman. That was evil enough. The hero was always a virtuous man (as he was poor) and used to ensure in the end that justice prevailed by the defeat of the devious rich baddies. It makes you cringe when you see the programmes about the “golden era” of films and old timers wishing that those “great” films were back again. The only saving grace about those films was their great music. Barring a few exceptions, they all were every bit trash as the ones made now, with nothing to offer other than moronic love stories. Some examples of the leading actors of that era (I have used nicknames by which they were known by to avoid being sued … haha):-


Mr Showman, whos claim to fame was his cheap impersonation of Charlie Chaplin and later on showing his leading ladies semi nude to the sex starved audience (his descendants joined the film industry too, one more pathetic than the other. )


Mr Jumping Jack who thought that wearing white shoes and doing P.T in the name of dance was acting.


Mr Evergreen who thought that jerking movements of the limbs and eyes was the way to act (he continued making films under his banner where he played everything from a journalist to a sharpshooter to a lawyer in the same film).


The first bollywood superstar , whos talent was largely making twisted movements with his hands and delivering all the dialogues in the same style in all the films and swirling around in circles in the name of dance. His immense popularity which included female fans writing letter in blood to him was the proof of the pedestrian standards of the film going public.


Mr Bharaat, who had the delusion of being the biggest patriot in the country’s history and made supposedly patriotic films (which turned out to be a laugh riot inspite of his efforts).


On top of that was the grandpa of all the actors, who in his six decades of acting hardly got to do anything else other than wearing a green shawl and thick glasses. But he is considered great.


I feel very blessed not to be born in that era.


One cannot even mention the 1980s and 1990s without expletives.

Cheap and lewd antics became the name of the game. Films became so pedestrian and cheap that they were forgotten as soon as they came. Upto such an extent that you could ask even the most ardent film goer today to name one remarkable film from the 1980s and there would be silence. The beginning of the 1990s saw a horrible twist in the tale, now every film had gigantic families living in palatial houses who had nothing to do but hold weddings and rituals and break into a dance. The men in the film have nothing to do except take part in the frivolous antics of the household( This has percolated to the television programmes and now irrevocably they are all made on such storylines) Or college students (actors in their 30s) who had nothing to do but carry two notebooks to colleges and dance in the basketball court and playgrounds. The era of meaningless cinema had begun and it continues. If the earlier films glorified poverty, these glorified extravagant lifestyle. The leading man may earn his living as a factory worker but he had to sing his songs in the Alps. The leading men of the films today consist of a vast army of Khans, one of them who considers stammering as acting and another who says taking a shirt off on screen is all that is needed. It also comprises of star kids who are considered “talented” as they are still surviving after all the dozens of the films that they have done have bombed.

This was the time when the criminal element became the part of the film industry. Drug, extortion and anti national investment flowed into the producers coffers to make more pedestrian fare, which continues unabated.

Bollywood afficionados should answer the following questions:-

Has Bollywood made even one feature portraying the country’s condition logically in more than sixty years of its existence? Has it even addressed one burning issue that faces the country and the world today or has in the past in a rational way?


Has Bollywood in its “historical” films, ever depicted history in a sane manner and without melodrama? Has it ever shown the country’s true heroes in a way that they deserve? Why cannot it look beyond glorifying invading barbarians in the name of making biopics and period films?


Why are all the films like different coloured gunny bags which have the same grade of rice in them? Why this eerie similarity?


Is there nothing in the world worth showing other than a “love story”? Is dancing like a steroid pumped baboon with dozens of other apes being romantic? Isnt there any difference between history and melodrama? Why cant the depictions of kings and freedom fighters be spared from being in a romantic angle? Must war films (I wish Bollywood never makes more of them) have songs as well? Are large rooms with glowing bulbs the only thing to be shown in the name of spy films? Are romance and jingoism the only two topics left on earth? Does Indian culture mean nothing other than showing gigantic joint families in palatial residences who have nothing to do but sing and dance every other day?


Why do the awards given to Hindi films every year have ridiculous categories like “best villain”, “best comedian”, “best newcomer actor/actress”? Doesn’t it show that same stuff is churned out again and again and again? And pray, why are the award functions held in English when the films are being made in Hindi?


Why does “inspiration” never come from the numerous literary works and short stories available but from Hollywood (and now also from South Korean) films? Inspiration is nothing but another word for plagiarism, which has run unabated in Bollywood since beginning. Maybe creativity means hiding your sources.

Why is it that more than the story and the script in the film what matters most is who’s acting in it and who’s making it?

People defending Bollywoood are always quick to point out that Hollywood too is full of trash. They are right. Hollywood is full of trash and it has a very hideous underbelly. But no matter how bad a year is for it, atleast ten good films come out annually. Without exception. Bollywood takes five decades to churn out ten good films. Go figure.


One stark truth which can never be uttered loud in the politically correct world is that Bollywood is just the promotion of the crescent & moon in the name of Indian culture. It hardly comes as a surprise that Bollywood is green in colour. Afterall, it is largely run through the money of the “Greenbhai”. That is why nobody seems to bother as to how millions and millions remain readily available for making the next box office dud and paying the exorbitant fees of the actors and crew inspite of flop after flop. Songs are full of pious words like Sajda, Ibadat and what not which can give us the allusion of listening to the proceedings of a seminary. It is needless to say that what greenbhai invests, he gets it fully. A famous gangster was asked as to why he kept investing money in failing ventures like this. His reply: Cause I get to do the heroines. That’s why.


With such a kind of criminal and anti national funding, can one ever expect anything good to come out? The films therefore are hardly logical and will always show the beloved minority in a glowing light. Always there will be a believer in the film who far exceeds in virtues to his other counterparts who follow another religions. If he becomes a terrorist in any of the films, it is only because of the evil Hindus and the injustice he faces in a horrible country called India that is always baying for his blood. Sikhs are either shown as comical or as killing machines. Christians, well they have little to do other than going to the church and wearing a crucifix. The lesser said about the depiction of Tamils and Bengalis, the better. As today’s targeted audience is comprised of Indian and Pakistani expats mostly, it is alright to make films belittling the country but never will an anti Pakistani or anti jehadi sentiment will be tolerated. Thats why you have seemingly "proud Indian" Khans dancing on Pakistani channels on the anniversary of the Mumbai terror attacks. Its no longer a dream to cherish. It has only become a vortex where girls are sucked in to irrevocable doom.


The independent cinema (also called art cinema) that rose into prominence in the 1970s gave a lot of hope in the direction of making quality cinema and was truly worthy of critical acclaim. Due to fund paucity, it lost all its actors little by little to the Bollywood cesspool where they were and are reduced to playing caricatures.


Bollywood today has hijacked the identity of Indian cinema to such an extent that people hardly realize that there is more to Indian cinema. It is totally devoid of quality and can never ever make anything remotely matching to world cinema. And it is not just about funds. Not with all the money in the world would it be able to make a war film like Saving Private Ryan. Or a fantasy like Lord of the Rings. Its useless to mention about intense drama here. There is no originality or creativity. There is only “inspiration”.



The real hope in Indian cinema lies with the independent filmmakers. It is heartening to see that the number is growing and they stand out among the crowd of ghouls. Already there are encouraging signs in the form of different films being made, both in Hindi and regional languages.It sure is a trickle which one hopes will turn into a torrent with time. But it can only happen when the viewers broaden their view to appreciate meaningful cinema instead of cheap thrills.

http://theviewspaper.net/art-or-perversion/

http://indiafacts.co.in/bollywood-as-a-mix-of-junk-food-and-islamism/

When backward is the way forward...

As Indians, there is one aspect in our daily lives, which we face everyday, and which we bear silently in pain. Caste based reservations.

Pain. It is pain. Because through it, millions suffer lost opportunities due to no fault of their own. Why? Because they despite being poor don’t get any help because they belong to a higher caste. On the other hand, in many cases, people with a comparatively richer background get all the opportunities they want as they are from the depressed classes.

Something is gravely wrong .

The division of caste in India was actually a division of labour, “varnashram” as it was called, profession being passed on from father to son through the ages. Over the period of time, it got mutilated into a system of society division, a tool for the powerful and influential for their vested interests. And this got deteriorated into a permanent divisive force in the Hindu society which continues till today.

The magnitude of the suffering the religion and the country bore because of this cannot be measured by anyone. This paved the way for various evils to set in, of the society being divided in the face of attack from invaders, of people being lost and in turn them joining the enemy forces, and ultimately ensuring that a very large section of the Hindu society does not remain Hindu even while being included in it.

One cannot deny the fact that resentment towards the Hindu fold has been growing in Dalits for centuries. The advantage of this was taken to the fullest by the missionary religions. A very huge part of people that were lost due to conversions were from the dalit fold. In case of any external aggression, this was amongst the first bastions to fall. Kerala , for example is less than 50% hindu, and things will only get much worse in other states as well.

It is atleast a matter of pride that every great leader who emerged in this country strived his best for this evil to go away. The society unfortunately never heeded to it. It is a sad fact that no effort was made by the upper castes at any point of time to stop the monotheistic religions from pulling dalits into their fold. On the contrary, they had the attitude of “good riddance”.In modern India , very stellar efforts were made from the likes of Sri Narayana Guru and later Jyotirao Phule for the upliftment of the depressed classes, as the never supported the idea that the benefit of the dalits lies in distancing themselves from the Hindus.

But all that changed in the twentieth century, with the emergence of the Dr B.R Ambedkar, who made his conclusion that the root of the problem lies in Hinduism itself and Dalits can never be human being s if they continue in its fold. He became the most revered figure for the depressed classes and has been criticized by various sections, the reasons being his hatred of Hinduism (his hatred was much more for the monotheistic faiths, a fact that has been cleverly covered up by the secular brigade and today’s Dalit leaders), his non participation in the freedom movement and his insistence to his followers to do the same( as he thought that unless social justice is achieved, political freedom is useless) and his hostility to the mainstream Indian leaders at that time.

To give him due credit, India has to be grateful to him eternally, for not choosing any semetic /monotheistic religion for converting himself ad his followers, but instead choosing to revive a religion which had been wiped out India seven centuries ago. Otherwise India would have paid a far far heavier price.

The Constitution of India, which was drafted by a committee headed by him, has made provisions to promote equality, e.g.

In fundamental rights it includes:-

Prohibition of discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth (Article 15)

Abolition of untouchability (Article17)

Part 16 of the constitution which deals with special provisions relating to certain classes includes:-

Reservation of SC/ST in house of people (Article 330)

Reservation of SC/ST in Legislative Assemblies (Article 332)

The above two reservations along with the representation of the anglo Indian community in the house were to end on the completion of fifty years from the implementation of the constitution.

Claims of SC/ST to services and posts (Article 335)

Establishment of the National Commission for SC/ST (Article 338)

Control of the Union over the scheduled areas and welfare of the scheduled tribes (Article 339)

Appointment of Commissions to investigate the backward classes (Article 340)

Scheduled Castes (Article 341)

Scheduled Tribes (Article 342)

It is the misfortune of this nation and society that personal gain has always been the opposite of national interest. In independent India, the elected leaders instead of striving to finish this evil once and for all, decided to continue with it in the most diabolical way. Reservations were introduced, basing them on caste instead of economic background. No effort was made to wipe out the division, instead the dalits were deliberately kept aside, to be developed into a vote bank. Being a vote bank, no efforts were made to really uplift them, but instead give sops like reservation to ensure their votes. The reservations based on caste were availed by the powerful and better placed sections in them, thereby depriving its real beneficiaries of it. This is also unfair to the meritorious people who miss out on the opportunities just because they do not fall into the “oppressed classes”.

This has resulted in the fact that the wall between different castes has been raised too high to be surmounted. And it has also created a situation where now the people belonging to the “higher” castes feel “lower”.

Efforts have been made by the government from time to time to extend the reservations to every nook and corner. It is more for the purpose of electoral gains than social reform (Its another story that the hypocrites don’t extend this reservation to their own domain. We are yet to see cabinet berths being reserved for SC/ST/OBC).

The biggest step in this direction in post independent India came in 1979 with the establishment of Mandal Commission which aimed to increase the quota from 27% to 49%, the extra quota being for Other Backward Castes or OBCs. For calculating the number of OBCs, the data from 1931 census was used as it was the last caste based census carried out. The population of Hindu OBCs was derived by subtracting from the total population of Hindus, the population of SC and ST and that of forward Hindu castes and communities, and it worked out to be 52 per cent. Assuming that roughly the proportion of OBCs amongst non-Hindus was of the same order as amongst the Hindus, population of non-Hindu OBCs was also considered as 52 per cent. The Commision also estimated that 54% of the total population excluding SCs and STs belong ing to 3743 different castes communities were “backward”.

In other words, this was intended to be a death blow to the very word merit as the commission decided that this word itself is the tool of oppression. In its own words:-

In fact, what we call ‘merit’ in an elitist society is an amalgam of native endowments and environmental privileges. A child from an advanced class family and that of a backward class family are not ‘equals’ in any fair sense of the term and it will be unfair to judge them by the same yard-stick. The conscience of a civilized society and the dictates of social justice demand that ‘merit’ and ‘equality’ are not turned into a fetish and the element of privilege is duly recognised and discounted for when ‘unequal’ are made to run the same race

A decade after its recommendations, the Mandal Commission recommendations were decided to be implemented by the Janata Dal government headed by VP Singh in 1990, with an eye on the dalit votebank. Massive protests followed nationwide, with two students self immolating of whom one , Surinder Chauhan was to lose his life. The committee recommendations were unable to be recommended.

But in 2005, a major step was taken in this direction by the Congress led UPA govt by drafting the proposed 104^th Amendment Bill to the constitution which went on to become the 93^rd Amendment. According to this, all private unaided educational institutes could be asked by their State Governments to reserve the designated seats for OBCs. This amendment has yet to pass the “Basic Structure” test of constitutionality by the Supreme Court .

It did not stop here. In early 2006, the HRD ministry under Arjun Singh also initiated to extend the caste based reservation quotas for OBCs in IITs and IIMs, along with the other Central Govt run higher education institutes, from 22.5% to 49.5%. These quotas were planned to be implemented not just in the 32 central institutions, but also in over 100 deemed universities. Dalit Muslims too were included in these reservations as the “government is fully committed to the cause of the muslims”. The govt did not buckle under any of the nationwide agitations that took place after the announcement as they themselves were the biggest beneficiaries of this kind of caste based politics. The opposition parties gave their approval as well to the amendments fearing the loss of backward caste vote bank.

The method used by the commission to calculate the number of OBCs is also dubious. National Sample Survey’s 1999-2000 defined 36% of the population as OBCs, which falls to 32% when one excluded muslim OBCs. A further recommendation was made by a member which divided the OBCs into upper OBCs (Gujjar, Jats etc). It was therefore a concern of this good samaritan member that the more powerful sections of the OBCs will lap up all the benefits .

Also, the names that are listed in OBC lists have in many cases been already listed in that of SCs and STs. In case of West Bengal, Urao along with its synonyms has been listed in OBC (OBC No 176), but it has been also listed as Oraon in ST list (ST 33). Similar is the case with:- Kharia (ST 23, OBC 103 with the synonym Lodha), Kherwar (OBC 107, ST 17 as Kharwar), Koda (OBC 113, ST 20 as Kora), Bhotia (OBC33 , ST 5 as Bhutia) and so on. Such examples are abundant. Not only have synonyms of OBCs been recorded as SC/ST and vice versa, but there are also manipulations like the same OBC names being listed multiple times in the list of the same state.

Taking the example of West Bengal again, many such STs are included which do not even belong to the state , e.g. Kuki (Nagaland, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Tripura), Lushai (Mizoram), Koli (Orissa, Rajasthan to Karnataka) etc. One can only guess the reason for such anomalies. Some OBC caste names are also obsolete of the forward castes. Tyagi, for instance, is included in upper caste and found in UP, Haryana and Delhi. Tyagi is the sanskritized form of Taga. But Taga is found in OBC list Haryana (OBC 74), Delhi (OBC 81) and UP (OBC 109).The most ridiculous thing is that Roman Catholic is not a religion but caste in the eyes of the commission (Latin Catholic OBC 106 Kerala), Anglo Indians as well (OBC 6, Kerala). The norms regarding Non-Hindu communities have been openly flouted like this, the reasons being too obvious. Although it has been decided at the outset that only occupational castes among the Muslims and Christians and the castes bearing the same name as a Hindu OBC or SC will be included as a Muslim or Christian OBC caste, the set rule was violated wherever political expediency dictated.

As a result of this caste based politics, merit has been nearly rendered irrelevant. One has to rise above the political correctness and be vocal about the fact that caste based reservations are a form of racial discrimination, a norm where inefficiency is awarded at the cost of efficiency.

Is there any way that the government can ensure that all these benefits are not lapped up by the more privileged sections of the “depressed” classes? The creamy layer is seen to have a stronghold over all this reservation business, and political class only supports them for garnering benefits during elections.

Without improving the standards of primary and secondary education, reserving seats for deprived classes in higher education institutes is meaningless. It will achieve nothing but instead will bring down the standard of these institutions.

Is it any justice that a deserving and not so financially well off person should be deprived of opportunity just because he happens to be in the open category?

Reservation has done nothing but made the wall between the castes higher, increased enmity between the castes and ensured that the gaps are never bridged and that the corrupt political class keeps on getting elected due to the divisions made by it.

How many scientists, engineers, professionals or sportsmen have been produced due to reservation? What great upliftment of that section of society has been achieved due to it?

It has achieved nothing but made freeloading a birthright for a large section of the society.

This can even prove detrimental to the economic well being of the county and discourage foreign investment. Six decades of reservation and one still sees that the reserved places are still not wholly utilized. More than 100000 government jobs in the reserved category remain vacant due to lack of suitable persons for the same. Any government cannot even think about filling them with people from the general category as it will surely ruin its chances in any subsequent elections. But they wont think of the fact that they might give more than 400000 other families a better chance of life.

Bluntly speaking, nobody from the so called upper classes is always well off, and nobody from the so called lower classes is always destitute. If a lower class person who roams around in cars gets the benefit of reservation over an upper class person who can barely make his ends meet just on the basis of caste, India is headed for social disintegration. If not now, then maybe after half a century.

We are already reaping rich benefits of this glorious social experiment. There is a whole bunch of political parties dedicated to the issue of reservations and depressed classes. Their agenda begins with reservation and ends with little anything else. They are not bothered about any other problems that India faces. India is my country only when I want reservations and I must get them. As for other problems that the country faces, let the evil Brahmans and devious Kshatriyas and greedy Vyshyas deal with them. So what if the champions of the poor dalits build statues and parks of themselves worth millions? So what if they hold lavish ceremonies all the time and collect “party funds” from people? So what if they fight on caste card, yet give the candidature to upper caste incumbents so that they can garner the votes from the same section of society they abuse and claim to fight?

Everyone wants their caste to be included in this section now. Many dominant castes have already dedicated people to the cause of reservations and have made a lot of organizations and they want themselves to be included in backward castes.

Anyone who thinks that powerful castes like Jats, Yadavs , Gujjars or Marathas are deprived classes needs a through psychiatric treatment.

India is the only country in the world where people fight for being called as backward.

Can such a country and such a society become anything in the world if it continues to be so small minded? Mera Bhaarat Mahaan (My India is Great) is what we proclaim. A country full of little people can never be great. It does not deserve to be.

It is sorely incorrect to blame the politicians for this situation. They haven’t created it, but merely exploited it. Do we have the guts to ask ourselves as to how such a hideous system could be devised and implemented? The answer is that we, the great cultured people as we like to call ourselves, have the inherent desire of being rewarded without doing anything worthwhile to deserve it. If you are poor, abusing someone wealthy is not going to make you any better. If you are useless, abusing someone efficient is only going to make your condition more pathetic than it is already. Self lamenting and self pity makes you a lesser person. Striving to be better is what takes you ahead. But who cares about this?

The attitude that we have developed is :-I belong to so and so caste/group/regionality etc etc, therefore I must get this benefit. It is very secondary that I’m no way good for it and that I will certainly ruin it. I will not elect a leader because he is efficient. I will elect him because he belongs to my caste and could extend me some benefits. I don’t want to belong to a progressive community, but to an influential lobby. It is not important if the leader I elect indulges in scams worth millions or is involved in anti-national activities. What is important is that he keeps on giving me freebies that I ask for. Everything starts and ends for me with my caste and that is the sole thing that makes me great.

That my friends, is the common man of an aspiring superpower.

As far as I am concerned, looking at today’s times, this is how the caste system should be constituted:-

A Brahman, regardless to what caste he was born under, is the one who imparts knowledge to students in schools, colleges, higher educational institutes, does research and innovation and strives to make the life of the countrymen better alongwith his own. He is the one who creates better countrymen for the next generation. He is also person who ensures that the laws are updated from time to time and are stern enough to keep the society safe.

A Kshatriya, regardless to what caste he was born under is the one who is the protector of the country against external and internal threat. He is also the one who ensures rule of the law in the land and inspires his countrymen to belong to their country.

A Vyshya, regardless of what caste he was born under is the one who brings prosperity to the country by creating new businesses and creating employment. He is the one who is the biggest countibutor to the country’s wealth.

Who is a Shudra then?

A Shudra is the one who, regardless of the caste he was born under, wants everything without doing anything for it. He is the one who thinks that living off the fat of the land and being inefficient is the way of life. All the evils in any society stem from this “shudra” attitude. This is what India has to end, if it has to stand a chance of being anything in the world.

Call me crazy or a dreamer, but this is how it should be.

The fault lies within us

“The fault, Dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but within ourselves”

- Cassius in Julius Caesar.

As millions of fellow Hindus feeling the pain of being under siege in their own land, I cherished a dream of reclaiming the lost glory, of bringing back the days when Bharatvarsh meant everything from whats Myanmar now to the beginning of Central Asia. It might seem like a pipe dream, but it is by no ways ridiculous. Knowing that our glory is more than a millennia past us, it’s not a weird thought to dream about a resurgence, a regeneration. For a long long time, I had a place in my heart for political outfits who claimed to stand for this cause of making us great again, to undo the wrongs done to us for the last eight centuries and more, which continue still, unabated. Reading the history which glorified the barbarians and demeaned the protectors of this country, sometimes even demonizing or negating them, filled me with great rage (it still does). The chronicles of massacres of unarmed Hindu men women and children throughout the medieval ages saddened me to no extent. Somewhere, someplace, the desire to set this right is in all of us. Idealism seems the most beautiful thing as a child and as a teen, its only when reality sets in that you realise of your naiveté.

I’m now left feeling that I was expecting rusty iron to become platinum.

Its such a misconception today amongst all the people that jehadis are suicidal. What I have learnt and seen so far is that if there is anyone who can be called as suicidal, it’s the Hindu. And he proves it countless of times, time and again. He also proves that he does not need Islam, Christianity or Communism to eliminate him. These three are merely vultures, waiting gleefully for this morbid and suicidal imbecile to torture himself to death. They have already begun feeding on him because they have realized that its not much of a difference in this zombie being alive or dead.

All that anguish at the sight of fellow Hindus suffering, of our culture and identity being slowly and steadily eroded away is useless because it is futile to feel any compassion and pain for a dead and myopic people who are sworn to their own destruction.

Who is responsible for it? The foreign hordes and their ideology?

True, we have been under attack since the last 2500 years, the damages of which have been devastating. Greeks, Huns, Pathians, Scythians and Bactro-greeks racially altered vast parts of the Indian populace by becoming part of it when conquest was impossible. A millennium and a half later, Islam made a bloody entry into India, permanently altering the ideological belief of a fifth of the population over the same period of time, turning them against their very land, the results of which are all for us to see. Its more sophisticated counterpart, Christianity followed a thousand years later with an equally bloody modus operandi. It did not make its converts agnostic, but made them self loathing of their ancestors.

But they did not create this situation. They merely exploited it.

The rot had set in a long time before the invasions.

Since time immemorial, we have the habit of mutilating a tradition and carrying it forward in the mutilated manner till the original is forgotten in the time. The caste system (Varna Vyavastha as it is was originally known) was conceived as a system of division of labour. How conveniently it was mutilated into a division of class so that it was to be used as a system of oppression for the benefit of a few, so that knowledge remained limited to them and that they keep on enjoying their privileged status perpetually. How much this has hurt us need not be told. Thousands converted forcefully to Islam and Christianity were denied re-entry into the dharma by the priestly class. The poor souls had no other option but to remain in their forced religion. Over the period of time, their successors became more fanatic muslims and did more to spread Islam in the subcontinent than the original adherents. It was the converts who made Islam what it is today, an expansionist force which cannot tolerate anything standing in its path.

Who took Alauddin Khilji’s conquest to the south of India? Malik Kafur, a converted eunuch.

Who islamized East Bengal? Murshid Quli Khan, a converted Tamil Brahmin.

Who defiled the glory of Kalinga? Kalaghoda, a convert.

Who wiped out the very traces of Hinduism in Kashmir? Sikandar , a fourth generation convert.

Fifty percent of the world’s Muslim populace is found in the Indian subcontinent today. Had the whims and fancies of a few Brahmins been ignored and had the initial converts been accepted back into Dharma, not just India, but the world would have been a better place. But no use crying over spilt milk now.

Earlier caste system was a trump card for the higher castes. Now it is a trump card for the lower castes. In fact today, it is far more beneficial to them. By keeping the tradition of giving sub human treatment to lowest of castes, we laid the foundation of our downfall. Today, thanks to the constitution, its them who are the bosses of the so called higher castes.

Over the passing centuries, Hindus developed a false sense of pride, that they are so superior , that they need not know what is going on outside their borders. So what if the foreign civilizations are progressing? Surely they cannot surpass our greatness. Al Beruni, the chronicler who accompanied Mahmud during most of his 17 invasions of north India, mentioned “I have never seen such superiority complex anywhere else. These fools think that the world begins and ends with them. They do not care to look beyond themselves to see where the rest of the world has gone”. Is it any surprise that this superiority complex affected populace was caught napping? Agreed that we fought Islam in the most heroic manner, but the damage was already done.

Benefit of the minority at the cost of majority. Is this an invention of the Congress (I) ? Definitely not.

That too was a classic Hindu trait. The new ideologies of Buddhism and Jainism received all the support from kings. Every kingdom went out of its way to shower Buddhist and Jain monks with wealth. This despite the fact that the Buddhists had supported Huns and Greeks during their various campaigns in India only because a few of their chieftans converted to Buddhism. The Ashokan era (which the seculars call as golden age of India, no prizes for guessing why) saw almost half of the states revenue going for the upkeep of Buddhist monasteries and monks, at the cost of the hard working populace and disbanding of the military. The working populace lived in poverty and frustration, soldiers were forced to doing menial jobs as a result of disbanding of the army while these overfed and lazy monks lived a life of luxury. Vedic tradition was in the danger of being extinct. Brahmins immolated themselves in large numbers to protest against this but no avail.33 years of Ashoka’s rule saw the deadening of the martial spirit of all north and central India. India became an open ground for Greeks, Scythians, Huns and Parthians to attack. It took a general in the once great army, Pushyamitra Shunga, to kill the last weak Mauryan ruler, to set things right. Pushyamitra then started eradicating the cause of the misery, and his successors followed suit. In Bengal too the Pala rulers followed a similar strategy. Is there any wonder that the secular historians have painted Ashoka as a hero and Pushyamitra as a villain?

One thousand years later, when the marauders of Islam entered Afghanistan after flattening everything in Central Asia, the Buddhists decided to have a similar approach to them as they had with the Greeks and the Huns a millennia ago. And they were promptly massacred for opening their doors to the monsters hoping that they would tame them. The same happened in what is Pakistan today. The Buddhist majority tried to convert and align with the Muslims and were promptly cut down. The land was awash in Buddhist blood. Butshikan is an Arabic word for iconoclast, someone who breaks idols. The word But is derived from Buddha. Judging by this, one can only imagine the humongous bloodbath of Buddhists by the Muslims and the thousands and thousands of Buddha idols broken by them. Hindus fought valiantly and held the attacker at bay. It took just one century for Islam to sweep the entire Central Asia and Afghanistan, but it took them seven hundred years to go from Peshawar to Delhi. The brain dead proponents of “thousand years slavery” never reveal this. All this happened only because Buddhism had spread to titanic proportions, killing the martial spirit among the Hindus due to its influences. At its zenith, it was followed by more than one third of the population residing in India.(Jainism, which was even more non violent in nature, thankfully never spread beyond the merchant guilds.) India became a killing field for Islam only because of the overwhelming majority of Buddhists in the region of what is called Afghanistan and Pakistan today, except Sindh where Hindus were the majority. It was the Buddhist who was cut down like a defenceless blade of grass whenever he was found. Hindus fought valiantly. There are still forty million Hindus in Sindh province in Pakistan despite of a thousand years of genocide. This alone is the proof. Had there been even one Hindu for every two Buddhists in Afghanistan and Pakistan, Islam would never had come to the subcontinent.

But then what attracted such a vast populace to Buddhism? Spiritualism? Philosophy? No. It was the temptation of freeloading, of living a great life at the expense of others. That is what drew people to become monks The promise of having a great life at the cost of others. And it was an easy way out. That still continues amongst us today. Freeloading, self deception, self denial, escapism and pretending that the problem does not exist instead of combating it.

Our readymade answer to our sorry state is “So what? Our culture, our civilization is much more ancient and superior to the west. We always will be ethically and morally stronger”. I have one question for these wise (?) men:-

Why would we only have the privilege of having traitors? Why are traitors and petty minded people born only amongst us? Why aren’t any traitors or petty minded people or corrupt people born in the immoral western society? Can anyone remember any official of the East India company defecting to the Mughals or the Marathas for his own selfish interests? Can anyone remember any British Civil servant during the Raj embezzling funds that were meant for the Queen’s treasury? Can we ever find any example of anyone in middle ages of an English official selling his country’s secrets to the French crown and vice versa? The most corrupt Senators and Congressmen in USA too will do nothing which will undermine America’s security, however decadent and greedy they may be.

Why is it that its only us greats that produce traitors? And not one or two but in thousands. Traitors are only cultivated in a special type of environment. Traitors and corrupt tendencies are never born in a place where the common man understands that his benefit is not different from that of his society and country. And we have not been able to create such a kind of culture is what is the bitter truth. Glancing through our history reveals time and again that all the great sons of India who fought for us have been defeated by their own petty minded compatriots than the enemies. Muslims never ruled India. They caused unprecedented damage, but it was beyond them to conquer India even with the aid of the biggest war machine at that time. Thousands of mercenaries coming each year to India for replenishing the dead of the marauding muslim armies is more than enough proof of it. The Muslim monarchs were only titular rulers, and the main work of consolidating their empire was done by Hindu kings themselves who happily became their vassals to take revenge against their regional rivals. Does it need to be mentioned here what disastrous effects this had?

Muhammad Ghori would never had won against Prithviraj Chauhan without Jaychand. Akbar would never had gained the upper hand over Rana Pratap without all the Mansinghs aiding him. Sambhaji would never have been captured by Aurangzeb and brutally tortured to death had people like Ganoji Shirke and various others would not have aided him. The British too took full advantage of this, and all the revolutionaries were captured and executed only because they were betrayed by traitors.

Its such a fashion among all Hindutvavadis to condemn the Turks, Mughals and British for being cowardly and winning by attacking our weaknesses and taking advantage of petty minded people amongst us by luring them away with all sorts of temptations. This is an absolute idiocy. They are our enemies. And they have and are and they will harm us. And they have done it very very successfully. The terror machines of Islam and Christianity are doing their job perfectly well, the Jehadi who uses all measures from war to taqqiya to overcome the infidel; the Missionary who is carrying out his respective church’s ,Catholic, Evangelical or Baptist, to the fullest of giving the Bible to gullible fools and take away their land in return. They are doing perfectly what their faith is demanding from them.

The question is, what are we doing to protect ourselves? Are we doing even remotely what our faith demands from us?

Today the situation is no different. We are unable to produce a single person of integrity to occupy public office, may it be of any level. There is not a single institution in our country that we can look upto without any doubt in our minds. That itself is enough to highlight our failure as a people.

How long are we going to live in self deception of calling ourselves “ethically and morally superior”, and degrading the west by calling it decadent? Do decadent cultures bring corruption into the smallest nooks and corners of their societies? Do decadent people feed their own children with adultrated milk ? Do decadent people loot their society and country?

And what ethically and morally superior culture are we talking about? Do we even remember what it is?

Its unthinkable to find a Christian who hasn’t read the Bible. Even a Muslim rickshaw driver knows his ayats and suras by heart. But only the rarest of the rare Hindu has even opened the Bhagwad Geeta.

As usual, are we going to find faults in everyone else except us and say that its Macaulay and Maxmueller who have done this damage? Who went eagerly to them to become a brown Englishman? Who threw away all his traditions and values and swallowed eagerly whatever was fed to him? Who became secular willingly? And joined his tormentors in condemning his own heritage? Who made the theatre and cinema halls his new temples?

The Hindu .

Who has become a traitor, an appeaser, a coward, a spineless blob of jelly who can only condone his enemies and appease them, frequently ganging up with them against his own people for some short term gains?

The Hindu.

The only English translation of the Vedas is by foreign scholars. Am I to accept an idiotic excuse that vedic scholars in India are not upto it? The wealth of all the major temples in India is managed by the secular government which conveniently directs this money for popular schemes and diverts it to madrassas and missionaries. This can never happen without the active participation of Hindus.

A culture is destroyed not by the forces that attack it, but by the decay that sets within.

“We learn from history that we never learn from history”. This applies to none other than us.

Let us analyse in short the reasons given by knowledgeable (?) Hindus whenever confronted with questions about their existence

“We have prevailed for thousands of years through all adversity, and we will still prevail, going by our glorious history”.

So it’s a belief amongst our scholars (?) that just because we have been saved till now by heroic battles means that we can be saved henceforth just by looking back at these incidents. A prime example of the pompous pride that we have sunk into. One only needs to look at the Zoroastrians (Parsees). One of the most ancient civilizations, one of the most formidable in the entire world in times of Xerxes and Darius. Today they are only a shadow of their past glory. Agreed that they have contributed immensely to India’s glory, that they are a minority every country will love to have, but at the end of the day if one doesn’t have the required numbers to ensure the continuity of ones way of life, all the glories and achievements come to a nought. Today this glorious community is not even classified as a religion, their numbers are so low. Their subsequent extinction in the coming two or three centuries is a bitterly true fact.

Why should we be an exception to this? Just because we have survived till now dos not mean that we are going to live forever. I’m sick of the so called scholars who act as if we are going to live forever. If a single titanic catastrophe (natural or extraterrestrial that still is the debate) can wipe out the very signs of dinosaurs that had dominated this earth for 150000000 years, the wiping out of the thousands of years old most glorious civilization of the homo sapiens is merely child’s play in comparison.

So, if we erstwhile glorious people want ourselves to be past tense, our entire existence being limited to museum artefacts like that of the Babylonian, Sumerian, Assyrian and Mesopotamian civilizations, we are going the right way.

“Our heritage and culture is timeless. We are intellectually superior to these Semitic religions. We will always have an ideological edge over them”.

To this I have one question “What good is your superiority if you don’t have any head left??? “The pen is mightier than the sword” is only good as a metaphor. Try fighting with a pen with someone who has a sword. Wars cannot be fought on heads alone. Ideas make plans, they don’t make war.

“Hindus have always been non violent”.

This is a classic argument by secular mental retards whose heads and posteriors are interchangeable.

If Hindus had non violent, would there be a single Hindu in the world today? Hindus single handedly fought the biggest war machine in medieval times. Since time immemorial, Hindus have been the most fiercest and ethical warriors. The fact that eighty percent of divided India are Hindus is more than a proof of the fact. The very fact that I’m a Hindu today is because some Hindu fought, killed and died for me. The Islamic war machine that flattened everything in its path was stopped for six centuries by the Hindus. East India Company was kept out Indian waters single handedly by only one family. These liberal morons probably think that the Marathas were spinning charkhas for fifty years in their fight against the Mughals.

The fact is that today Hindus have no stomach to fight the threats that stare them in the face. They have become the wimps who are looking for soft targets. They have no desire to fight the problems facing them, so they sidetrack the real dangers, and attack the smaller rivals who are inconsequential and who cannot fight back. They have become seculars and liberals only because cowardice and self denial has become a virtue and a way of life for them. All the anti hindu forces are comprised of Hindus themselves. We have exactly become the cowards that our beloved Bapu and Chacha wanted us to be.

All that the Hindu organizations do is lament the fact that how Christian and Islamic institutions are never losing a single opportunity to attack Hindus. They should instead look within and ask themselves,

Why cant a single Hindu organization gear up to combat them?

Why cant a single Hindu organization answer effectively at the various accusations being heaped on them?

Why cant a single Hindu organization come up with an agenda to stop religious conversions?

Why cant a single Hindu organization adapt itself to modern times, make themselves relevant for the youth, introducing to them the heritage that has been forgotten?

All that they do in the name of saving religion is talk about banning cow slaughter (conveniently forgetting that they themselves wear leather belts and leather shoes). Their second rung leadership is full of rustic idiots who cannot speak one legible sentence nor have any relevant knowledge about the religion or the world around them. That is why jokers like Zakir Naik can call themselves scholars on Hinduism while these morons circulate pictures of Reese Witherspoon as that of a young Sonia Gandhi. No wonder the seculars are laughing all the way.All they can do in the name of being aggressive is burn Valentines day cards and slap young couples in parks. Some of these eunuchs (in my humble opinion, real men never hit women) get the wrong feeling of being men by storming into pubs and beating up women. Where do these mongrels go when temples are desecrated and Hindus killed in riots?

One of these cow piss drinkers had written somehwhere “The most painful sight for a Hindu is to see a cow being slaughtered”. Someone tell the retard that most painful sight for a Hindu is to see himself and his culture being persecuted in his own land. If these organizations cannot prevent it, they should drown themselves. Just giving empty slogans like”Hindu jagega, Vishwa jagega” is mere tokenism.

And then these same morons lament about the cunningness of the enemies.

Hindus today should be ashamed of themselves. If not their history, then atleast others history should inspire them. The children of Israel have been persecuted and driven out since time immemorial. Nineteen centuries of Christian love and fourteen centuries of Islamic love has threatened them with extinction constantly. But today they stand with their heads held high, and they have earned their respect.

These proud people finally fought and wrestled their land from the people who were sworn to their destruction. Two thousand years of wilderness and various pogroms and a holocaust was an inspiration enough. Israel is hardly as big as a small district in India, its population being equal to an average Indian city. An Israeli is outnumbered by his enemies by one to one hundred. But it does not deter him, because he remembers the following:-

“What the world says about us is not important. The only important thing for us is that we should be able to live with dignity in the land of our forefathers”- David Ben Gurion.

But a hypocrite, morbid, cowardly race who have by hearted Gandhian pious platitudes and Nehruvian cowardly lies can never live by the above statement. And these imbeciles dream of being a world superpower.

There is no use wasting time on crying about the Islamization and De-Hinduization of India. It has been done long ago, and done effectively by Hindus themselves in sixty years , the very task that could not be done by Islam and Christianity in more than ten centuries.

There is no use harping about past glories, and praising the religion if one cannot live by it. Nine Hundred Million Hindus are insignificant in their own land, the rest scattered like dust around the globe. On the other hand , twenty six million Jews are a fearsome force to reckon with.

What are we proud of then?

And when are we going to start living instead of merely existing?