Somehow football, or the beautiful game as the Brazilians call it
or soccer as the Americans call it, never found a fan following in India
(except in West Bengal, Goa and Kerala) as it has in the rest of the
world, even among the working class. Why it is so is one of biggest
mysteries in the world, considering that this sport can pay rewards that
can exceed cricket or tennis by a long way and that the lower middle
class and working class from which all players have sprung from is
plentiful in this part of the world as well.
There is a shocking degree of disinterest about the sport here. The
popular media here only covers The World Cup and The Euro Cup. Thats
the only time when the sport gets wide coverage here. Therefore the only
players who gain recognition here are the ones who play and shine in
these two tournaments.
Hence whenever the question of who was the greatest comes up, people dont look beyond Pele or Maradona.
Hence whenever the question of who was the greatest comes up, people dont look beyond Pele or Maradona.
But as anyone who follows football will tell you, international
matches (match between national teams ) are hardly five to ten percent
of the football matches that are played during a given year, or lesser
than that. The rest is club football, which being professional is much
more tougher and challenging. The toughest football tournament is not
the World Cup or the Euro, but the UEFA Champions League where 32 of the
best club teams in Europe battle it out from September to May every
year since the tournament began in 1956.
The reason why the World Cup was conceived in 1930 was to have a
tournament involving national teams to be prestigeous enough for the top
players to participate. Same with Europan cup which was started in
1960.
I would first like to make clear that I'm by no way belittling Pele
or Maradona or international football. But before calling them the
greatest footballers, one needs to take a few things into account.
These two were strikers.
A striker has the possession of the ball for not more than 5-6
minutes from the entire 90 plus minutes of the match. How well a striker
plays or whether he scores or not is determined by the midfield. It is
the midfielder who has the bulk of possession of the ball, it is him who
decides the pace of the match. Defenders are seldom superstars because
people forget that stopping/saving goals is as spectacular and important
as scoring goals, sometimes even requiring more skill than scoring,
risky as well as it is replete with the challenge of getting booked.
No need to explain how thankless a goalkeeper's role is. Thats why
the likes of Kahn, Shilton, Yashin, Casillas, Buffon will never get half
the spotlight of their 10 counterparts in the team.
So the game is much more about who scores a goal or who gets to be the one that scores it.
Defenders like Franz Beckenbauer, Carles Puyol, Paolo Maldini and
Lillian Thuram (just to quote four examples) are worth their weight
in precious stones. The way they stop the goals is at times much more
pleasurable to watch than the goals being scored. Their tally of goals
is hardly into double figures. So are they not to be called great just
because they arent the goalscorers?
And what about the soul of football, the midfielders like Zidane,
Rivaldo, Charlton, Giggs, Cryuff, Di Stefano and Messi? (the last three
being able to play the roles of forwards as well) ?
The number of goals scored by them is not eye boggling, but their role is the deciding factor.
The reason why Pele is termed as the greatest footballer is given
as he scored the most goals till date, 1200. Maradona because of the
spectacular Argentina triumph of the 1986 World Cup mainly.
Pele can be termed as the best striker in international football
where he scored 77 goals in a hundred odd matches he played and played a
great part in Brazil winning the 1958 and 1970 World cups.
But he played all his career in the Brazilian League with Santos
FC. The Brazilian League has a lot of flamboyance at the cost of
substance and high scoring matches are the norm, with four or five goals
being scored in a game being commonplace. It was therefore easy to see
how Pele and another Brazilian great Romario who played for Vasco da
Gama FC got to a thousand goals. Maradona by that comparison played in
much tougher conditions, for FC Barcelona and then for Napoli, even
though he played the bulk of his career for Boca Juniors.
The conditions in European leagues are not so liberal for high
scoring. The conditions in EPL, Primera Liga, Serie A and Bundesliga to
name the top four are very tough and there is hardly any open space for a
goal to be squeezed in. 3-2, 2-2 are the normal scorelines (or in case
of Serie A, 1-0 ). Hence the arguably greatest players to never paly the
World Cup Alfredo di Stefano (who according to many is the best ever)
and the tragic George Best playing in Spain and England respectively
stand out. Their total tally of goals is not even half of Pele, but the
conditions in which they scored them were and remain much more testing.
The best players always look forward to playing in Europe and not
in any Latin American or Asian League. Any Argentine would look forward
to play in Barcelona instead of Boca Juniors or any Brazilian in AC
Milan instead of Fluminese . Thats where the biggest money and the best
quality is.
Thats where the contemporary players like Messi, Rivaldo,Raul,
Zidane,Maldini etc stand out as they have played their entire careers in
much more testing conditions than any league in Latin America. Its
unfair that they be put below the past greats just because somehow the
present cant be romanticized or glorified.
Messi has joined the all time greats by playing Barcelona where he
effortlessly skips between midfield and forward positions. Maradona had a
miserable two years in the same team.The name of the great Gerd Muller
who was the mainstay of the attack of Bayern Munich through all the
1970s and was instrumental in the then West Germany winning the World
Cup in 1974 is not even mentioned in the same breath. Neither are Johann
Cruff and Alfredo di Stefano, "total footballers" who could play in any
position. Strange.
When deciding greatness, all aspects of the game have to be taken
into account. Its unfair to ignore club football over international
football and vice versa. The media of country like India conveniently
ignored club football till the end of the 1990s and never mentioned
players who were never able to play the world cup, e.g., players like
Ryan Giggs or George Best, because Wales and Northern Ireland couldnt
produce ten other worthy players to play alongside them.
So in simple words, its not just the ones who score goals that are
great, but also the ones who create them or stop them. As Zidane once
said "This is a team game. Individual glory here is worth nothing. You
pass the ball to the next guy 99 out of 100 times".
No comments:
Post a Comment