Eight CRPF
soldiers returning from the shooting range were ambushed by militants in
Pampore, J&K, and the rickety bus carrying them became their coffin.
Another 25 were grievously injured. And in true ‘’character’’ which defines our
news traders, this was not given importance of more than one day. After all,
what is the life of a paramilitary soldier in comparison to some actress
twisting her ankle during shooting.
Elsewhere at the
same time in New Delhi, the Pakistan High Commission hosted a grand iftar
party, in which Kashmiri separatists were given an honoured place, and to rub
salt on wounds, it was proclaimed that Pakistan wants nothing more than
friendship with India.
India is the
world’s largest arms importer. It has the third largest standing army in the
world. In BSF and CRPF, it has the largest paramilitary in the world. If you
look at the numbers, leave the Indian army, navy and airforce aside, India’s
paramilitary alone is bigger than most of the countries defence forces today.
And yet we allow
this kind of humiliation to be heaped on us.
And why blame
Pakistan? What has been our leaders response to this latest attack? The same
repetitive reply of we will not fire first but we will retaliate strongly by
the Home Minister Rajnath Singh. From the J& K state govt,from CM Mehbooba
Mufti, the same oft repeated statement that terror in the name of Islam
is wrong (the same people were wailing for AFSPA removal) and that such attacks
will drive away tourists . J&K opposition is busy cornering her for her
remarks that “she was ashamed as a Muslim” due to these attacks.
But what about the
lives of the soldiers lost? How long should they pay for the callousness of the
state, where they are not even allowed to fire on murderous mobs who routinely
injure policemen and paramilitary soldiers by stoning? We had that horrible
situation under the UPA govt where catapults were given to the policemen
instead of guns. And during this BJP govt’s tenure too, the army was used
during floods in Kashmir to save the same stone pelting crowd because elections
were around.
India’s policy
with Pakistan is horribly inadequate at least by the value of it. Whether it be
returning the 93000 POWs during 1971 war without making actual gains or Kargil
war as a gift for Vajpayee’s Lahore bus trip in 1999, or the parliament
attack of 2001 , India’s response has not been anywhere to finding a permanent
solution. Whatever the soldier wins in the battle, the leaders lose at the
table. Pakistan has nothing to offer to India except treachery and terrorism,
and yet infuriatingly our leaders indulge in engaging with peace talks and other
overtures, only to fall flat in the face.
India has the
largest paramilitary in the world, but it has routinely been facing challenges
due to lack of good weaponry and facilities. The sub par conditions under which
CRPF fights Maoists in red corridor are our shame, where in many cases they are
left without basic equipment and even effective training. Central Police Forces
have been the unsung heroes of our county, and their role in fighting internal
and external threats is hardly acknowledged by the general public or the
government. Add to the fact that BSF, CRPF and other Central Police Forces come
under the Home Ministry, and are headed by the IPS. It makes bad matters worse.
The Indian army is one of the best in the world, but even it is marred by poor equipment.Its
shameful for a country that can launch satellites in space and who has ICBMs
cannot give its soldiers a decent assault rifle.
Both the Army and
the paramilitary face the brunt of bureaucracy blocking clearances for
necessary acquisitions or outrightly denying them, be it snowmobiles, or even
compensations for the family of slain soldiers. But its interesting to note
that politicians and civil servants perks are never found to be unnecessary
expense. A country which places the whims of politicians and bureaucrats over
necessities of soldiers deserves all the misery it gets.
Agreed that
Kashmir terrorism today is a fraction of what it was during 1990s, but under no
condition can death of security personnel due to poor equipment be excused.It
cannot be denied that there are full fledged efforts to revive terrorism in the
valley, with the well established terror groups now bringing in new generation
of operational commanders (this attack was orchestrated by Hafeez Saeed’s son
in law). If terrorism fails, civil disobedience is their trusted weapon. Would
the death and injury been so high if they were provided an armoured vehicle?
Is transporting security personnel in vehicles without any bullet proof
protection, without a convoy in troubled areas logical? The Home ministry has
accepted that there was a serious lapse, intel sources had intercepted
communications by terrorists planning for an ambush a few hours earlier but the
area was unclear. To make the matters worse, CRPF and Army argued over who
managed to kill the terrorists.
India was
virtually alone in combating the jihad (yes, that’s the proper word, not
insurgency) since 1990, after the Soviet Union’s collapse, cornered by China
and loaded with sanctions by US, with the mujahideen fighting the Soviet army
in 1980s pouring in thousands to Kashmir, backed with Pakistani logistics and
US funds (USA used Pakistan to channel weapons to Afghan mujahideen[who later
became Taliban], nearly half of which were diverted to Punjab terrorism and
later on to Kashmir terrorism by Pakistan, thereby funding a decade and a half
long proxy war), while the world did not do much except pay a token of
condemning the terror acts.
It remains a fact
that in any sane country with competent governance, Punjab and Kashmir
terrorism would have been dealt with swiftly. In both Punjab and Kashmir,
situations were allowed to deteriorate by vested interests, and in the end it
was left to the people and soldiers to die for these follies. But that doesn’t
take away anything from bravery of the Indian soldier who has exceeded all
expectations to combat terror (speaking of the latest example of Pampore, the
injured soldiers in the bus managed to fire more than 90 rounds and prevented
the terrorists from doing further damage until backup arrived ), inspite of the
apathy and incompetence of the neta babu kleptocracy. But how long can these
brave men taken for granted? We have some ‘’leaders’’ who queued up for
becoming Ishrat Jahan’s fathers (Her poor mother !) but who couldn’t receive
the bodies of dead soldiers on the airport saying “soldiers are meant to die”.
But leave aside
the politicians and the news traders, how is the common man in India with
regards to all this? The common man, who ‘’bravely’’ calls for war against
Pakistan (while never having the courage to stand up to a ruffian) or boycotting
Chinese goods (while flooding his house with Chinese made electronics) is
little interested in knowing about his country’s army beyond subsidized liquor,
or has scant regard for even acknowledging the difficult conditions under which
the forces serve. He has zero interest in knowing the difference between a
sergeant and a captain or a brigade and corps or infantry and artillery. To
find a country where people are as callous to internal & national security
like India is nearly impossible (well maybe in the now turned left looney
states of Scandanavia, but even they have/had military service). Nowhere in the
world probably is the disconnect between the military and civilian as stark as
that in India. How many civilians know anything about the ranks of the army,
navy or airforce? Or for that matter, the difference between a battalion and a
corps? Or leave aside all that, how about any realization how the forces keep
us safe?
The Indian
citizen’s patriotism starts and ends with waving flag during cricket matches
and enthusiasm starts and ends with queuing to watch the latest trash from
Bollywood. He will wait for hours to get a glimpse of a film star or a cricket
player, sell his vote for cheap rice, vegetables , wifi or some other freebies
but will never do anything constructive or have any thought about his duties as
a citizen. He should ask himself:- Is he worth fighting for?
No comments:
Post a Comment